Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Finkbohner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 6, 1996No. 1951363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs George W. Finkbohner III and Sandra Finkbohner petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to compel the defendant Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company ("Principal Mutual") to comply with a discovery request. The petition is granted in part and denied in part.

Sandra Finkbohner underwent a surgical procedure to repair a ventral hernia. It appears from the evidence presented that this procedure was determined by Ms. Finkbohner's personal physicians and her medical insurer, Principal Mutual, to be medically necessary to correct an abdominal problem that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Principal Financial GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Campbell v. Regal Typewriter Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ex Parte ClarkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte National Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Simmons v. Congress Life InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte American Carpet Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API