Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Friedman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 23, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

37 N.J. Super. 52 (1955)

116 A.2d 793

LAURETTE B. FRIEDMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ABRAHAM R. FRIEDMAN, ALSO KNOWN AS RUSSELL FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 19, 1955.

Decided September 23, 1955.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. John VR. Strong argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys; Mr. David H. Isacson, of the New York Bar, associate counsel).

Mr. Joseph J. Mutnick argued the cause for respondent (Mr. George G. Mutnick on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zehrer v. ZehrerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Dinnebeil v. DinnebeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Soos v. SoosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Bonardi v. BonardiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Sheehan v. SheehanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Morrone v. MorroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Del Peschio v. Del PeschioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. Melia v. MeliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API