Legal Opinion
State v. SORRELHORSE
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 2011No. 29,894; 33,142PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Our opinion filed March 22, 2011, is hereby withdrawn, and this opinion is filed in its stead. We deny the State’s motion for rehearing.
{2} Defendant Randy Sorrelhorse appeals his convictions for breaking and entering and criminal damage to property. Defendant argues that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for breaking and entering, and (2) his conviction for criminal damage to property violates his right to be free from double jeopardy. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Defendant’s conviction for breaking and entering, and we vacate…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BernalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HoltNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
- State v. HoltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. BegayeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. HoltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.