Legal Opinion

State v. De Grace

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Defendants were jointly indicted for the crime of unlawfully devising a scheme to defraud in the sale of securities of the Prudential Bancorporation and in committing an overt act in furtherance thereof in violation of section 25-1325, Oregon Code 1930. Separate trials were had and both defendants were convicted. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction against the defendant DeGrace.

The first, second, and third assignments of error relate to the ruling of the trial court in overruling the demurrer to the indictment. The indictment, in substance, charges that while the defendants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Gruher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ReyesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. McMichael v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. State v. MimsOregon Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API