Legal Opinion
McMichael v. Harris
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 11, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.
As plaintiff below, the plaintiff in error brought a common law action against defendant in error. The declaration was in two counts, the first for alienation of affections, and the second for criminal conversation. A change of venue was seasonably moved for and denied. ■ The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant ón both counts, final judgment was entered accordingly, and writ of error taken to this Court.
The sole error argued in this Court is predicated on the order of the court below denying the motion for change of venue.
No bill of exceptions was brought up. Only that part of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. DickensonSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Littleton v. BurgessWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Northeastern Nebraska Railroad v. FrazierNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Adams v. Knabb Turpentine Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Bassett v. Talquin Elec. Coop., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Della-Donna v. Gore Newspaper Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Burger King Corp. v. KoeppelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.