In re the Specific Performance of the Agreement between Ulman & Ulman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Rockland county dated August 24, 1932, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the application by Mulla Ulman for an allowance under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act denied on the law and in the exercise of discretion. Mulla Ulman was not a “ distributee ” or a “ person interested ” in the estate of Augustina Ulman under the will of October 23, 1930, the probate of which he resisted and the validity of the testamentary provisions of which he challenged in other proceedings. There was, therefore, no basis for the allowance, either as a…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of RosenblathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933