Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Sligh v. Fullerton Construction Co.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 12, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 66-826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

This action was instituted by the Use-Plaintiffs, Thomas D. Sligh and M. L. Shaw, d/b/a Sligh Plumbing and Heating Company, to recover of defendant pursuant to Title 40 U.S.C.A. Section 270a et seq., commonly referred to as the Miller Act. The complaint alleges that on or about December 28,1964, defendant entered into a written contract with Use-Plaintiff by the terms of which Use-Plaintiff was to perform that part of the contract described as Plumbing for the sum of Nine Thousand Four Hundred and No/100 ($9,400.00)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruce v. BlalockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Breedin v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Proffitt v. SittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Charles v. B & B TheatresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grayson v. Aetna InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  2. STANLAKEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. Fullerton Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API