Legal Opinion

Breedin v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 16, 1923No. 11346PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

Action to recover the sum of $4,500.00, with interest, alleged to be due the plaintiff by defendants under and by virtue of the terms of a contract in writing which will be hereinafter fully set out.

The complaint alleges, in substance, (1) that on January 27, 1920, the plaintiff entered into a written agreement with P. E. Clinkscales, whereby Clinkscales undertook to sell and the plaintiff to buy a certain lot of land in the City of Anderson upon the terms and conditions therein set out; (2) that plaintiff had complied with all the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keller v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Wheeler v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Chism v. SchipperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
  4. Hardin v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  5. McLure v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bruce v. BlalockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. City of Greenville v. Washington American League Baseball ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Cannon v. PULLIAM MOTOR CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Epting v. Lexington Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API