Dailey v. Coker
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Karnes. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Carpenter. The facts of the case are clearly stated in tbe opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
On the trial of this cause in the district court the defendant below objected to the reading in evidence to the jury the receipt sued on, because the same was not stamped as required by the revenue laws of the United States, and thereupon the plaintiff asked and obtained leave of the court for that purpose, and then in open court attached to said receipt the United States revenue stamp required by law and again offered to read the receipt in evidence to the jury, and defendants again objected, because the receipt had not been stamped in the manner required by law. Defendant’s objections were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carpenter v. SnellingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Hallock v. JaudinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Beebe v. HuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- McAfferty v. HaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Lynch v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rowland & Co. v. PlummerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Watson v. MirikeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
- Glasgow v. De LappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co. v. District Court of San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.