Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime VILLASENOR-CESAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1997No. 96-30194PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Overview
Jaime Viilasenor-Cesar appeals his sentence imposed following a trial to the district court on stipulated facts. Viilasenor-Cesar contends that the district court erred by failing to adjust his sentence downward an additional one-level, pursuant to section 3E1.1(b)(2) of the Sentencing Guidelines, based on his acceptance of responsibility. Because Viilasenor-Cesar did not timely notify authorities of his intention to plead guilty, he did not qualify for the additional one-level adjustment. We therefore affirm.
Background
Viilasenor-Cesar was indicted for one…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Roberto GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Antonio McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny Mateo VANCE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Bobby Lee HopperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Juan Espinoza-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Otis W. Fellows, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Javier Ochoa-Gaytan, A.K.A. Rodolfo Rodriguez-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Benjamin Corona-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Rakesh DhingraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.