Legal Opinion

United States v. Javier Ochoa-Gaytan, A.K.A. Rodolfo Rodriguez-Ortega

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2001No. 99-50366PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the fact that a defendant attempted to suppress his confession and chose to proceed to trial rather than to plead guilty makes the defendant ineligible under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. Because we conclude that the Sentencing Guidelines create no such categorical ineligibility, we vacate the district court’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

Background

On August 28, 1998, a border patrol agent found Ochoa-Gaytan and three others walking along a trail in California…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Luis Manuel Rodriguez-LaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Douglas Merrill NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API