Legal Opinion

Kemper Architects, P.C. v. McFall, Konkel & Kimball Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1992No. 91-231PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, District Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to examine the standard of performance to be applied in an action for implied contractual indemnity. The issue concerns professional engineering services supplied under the terms of an oral contract between the engineer and the architect. The architect appeals what it terms the improper application of tort standards to a breach-of-contract action. Additionally, the architect challenges several evidentiary rulings dealing with the hearsay exception for public records, redac-tions, and expert testimony. Finding the instructions adequately…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. James Earl PaivaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Charles C. Randolph, D/B/A Hardens Fried Chicken v. Collectramatic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hulse v. First American Title Co. of Crook CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API