Legal Opinion
In Re Kazas
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1937No. Crim. 421PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an original proceeding wherein petitioner seeks release from confinement under the charge of violating the provisions of Ordinance Number 495, New Series, of the City of Bakersfield.
We quote the pertinent provisions of this ordinance as follows:
“Section 1. The existence of a national, state and local emergency productive of widespread unemployment and disorganization of trade and industry which affects the peace and welfare of all the people of this city, is hereby recognized, and among the trades and industries particularly affected are those in which service is rendered to the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- International Ass'n of Cleaning & Dye House Workers v. LandowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.