Legal Opinion
In re Danny R.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 21, 1992No. 12531PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
The child, who was born on November 27, 1971, appeals the revocation of his probation for embezzlement, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-8 (Cum.Supp. 1991), arguing that (1) “[t]he state is barred, by public policy considerations, from prosecuting [him] for embezzlement because he breached the conspiracy,” and (2) “ ‘[e]ntrustment’ under the embezzlement statute should not include entrustment made pursuant to a criminal conspiracy.” We affirm.
The relevant facts of this case are as follows. The child was adjudicated a delinquent in August 1988 because he allowed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. MossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PittsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. McCoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993