Legal Opinion
Littman v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 1989No. 88 Civ. 3603 (MBM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Defendant, Firestone Tire & Rubber Company (“Firestone”) renews its motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Gilbert Littman’s sole surviving claim: namely, that he was fired for disclosing alleged fraudulent activities by certain unnamed employees under New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act of New Jersey, NJ.Stat.Ann. § 34:19-1 et seq. (1988) (CEPA). In a March 30, 1989 opinion, reported at 709 F.Supp. 461, I dismissed plaintiff’s claims that defendant discriminated against him on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Higgins v. Pascack Valley HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Nettis v. LevittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Barratt v. Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Nettis v. LevittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.