Legal Opinion

Herrell v. Hickok

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1934No. 2965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LLOYD, J.

It is contended first, that the law of the place where the cause of action arose governs the substantive rights of the parties, and that the law of the forum controls as to the quantum of evidence necessary to require submission of the issues involved to the jury. Secondly, it is contended that without regard toi the law of Ohio, the law of Michigan as announced in various decisions of its Supreme Court required submission of plaintiff’s cause of action to the jury.

Because this court agrees with the second contention of plaintiff in error, it is unnecessary and would be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Finkler v. ZimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Boos v. SauerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. De Shetler v. KordtOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FoodyOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Herrell v. HickokOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Herrell v. HickokOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hickok v. HerrellOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Wilker Sullivan, Jr. v. Ace BruceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API