Legal Opinion

Herrell v. Hickok

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LLOYD, J.

Helen Hen-ell, plaintiff in the Com-* of Common Pleas, appeals to this court on questions of law from a judgment in favor of The Yorkshire Indemnity Company of New York entered on the sustaining of its general demurrer to her second amended supplemental petition, wherein, under the provisions of §9510-4, GC, she seeks to recover a judgment against the indemnity company for an unsatisfied judgment procured by her against Clarence Hickok through whose fault she sustained personal injuries.

The only error assigned is the sustaining of the demurrer and the entry of judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Georgia Cas. Co. v. Alden MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Fox Wisconsin Corp. v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Briggs Hotel Co. v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  5. Robinson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API