Herrell v. Hickok
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
The judgment in the Court of Common Pleas in favor of the appellant was rendered after a demurrer was süstained to the second amended supplemental petition. In reviewing the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals, this court can examine only' the allegations of the second amended supplemental petition to determine whether the facts therein stated constitute a cause of action against the appellant, The Yorkshire Indemnity Company.
If these allegations disclose that the judgment rendered in favor of the appellee, Helen Herrell, was due to bodily injuries, accidentally sustained, caused by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Georgia Cas. Co. v. Alden MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Reserve Trucking Co. v. FairchildOhio Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Page v. Wieland, Recr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940