Legal Opinion

Neiman v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1962No. Gen. 48,436, 48,439, 48,551PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCORMICK

This court allowed petitions for leave to appeal from an order granting a new trial in the suits of Edna Ripstein v. City of Chicago and Pearl Neiman and Tilva Paull v. City of Chicago. The petitions, filed in accordance with section 77 (2) of the Civil Practice Act, were based on the ground that the order of the trial court granting a new trial is void.

The case grew out of an accident caused by a collision of two automobiles. One automobile was owned and operated by William Pauli. Samuel and Edna Ripstein, Benjamin and Pearl Neiman, and Tilva Pauli were passengers in that automobile. Pauli…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The People v. ThroopIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. McCord v. Briggs & TurivasIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Lindauer v. PeaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Kooyumjian v. StevensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Metropolitan Trust Co. v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welch v. Ro-Mark, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Bizarro v. ZieglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. In Re Application of RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. GimmlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Rozner v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API