Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 18, 1981No. 79-517PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This is what is commonly known as a slip and fall case. Mrs Ethel V. Moore's action for damages on account of personal injuries for negligence and wanton misconduct was submitted to the jury against Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.; Mayer Mitchell, Abraham Mitchell, and W.A. Lubell, partners doing business under the name and style of M L Realty; and the Mitchell Corporation. Winn-Dixie's cross-claim against M L was not, irregularly but not erroneously or improperly,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Industrial Tile, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Gribble v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Powell v. BradyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Brown Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. Milam & Co. Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. General Television Arts, Inc. v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API