Legal Opinion

Gribble v. Cox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 9, 1977PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a joint appeal by plaintiffs William Leonard Gribble and wife Joan Gribble from separate judgments in favor of defendants John Douglas Cox and Arthur Anderson and Company in separate actions by the Gribbles against Cox and Arthur Anderson and Company that were consolidated for purposes of trial. The amount sued for by each of the Gribbles was in excess of ten thousand dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, therefore the joint appeal to this court will lie.

The action of Gribble was for damages on account of personal injuries and property damage and that of Mrs. Gribble was for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vest v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Long v. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Sturdivant v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Marsh v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Senn v. Alabama Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ensor v. WILSON BY AND THROUGH WILSONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Jones v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API