Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Norton Construction, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1993No. 92-285PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Pamela and Rick Lynch (the Lynches) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Norton Construction, Inc. (Norton) on the Lynches’ claim of negligence. The district court found Norton owed no legal duty to the Lynches and was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

*1096We decline to adopt the accepted work doctrine urged by Norton, which would extinguish a contractor’s liability to third persons upon the owner’s acceptance of the contractor’s work. We hold instead that a contractor does owe a duty of reasonable care to foreseeable users, even after an owner’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strakos v. GehringTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Boehm v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Hale v. DepaoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Stephenson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan MinistrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Duncan v. Afton, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Duncan v. Town of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API