Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2004No. 49A04-0311-CR-593PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Joshua Rogers appeals his convictions after a bench trial of eriminal recklessness as a Class D felony 1 and battery, as a Class A misdemeanor. 2 He raises four issues for appeal, which we consolidate and restate as:

1. Whether the trial court properly admitted hearsay testimony based on the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule;

2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to convict Rogers of erimi-nal recklessness; and

3. Whether the trial court erred when it sentenced Rogers.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On November 13,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Spencer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. State v. HemberttNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. People v. KingColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API