Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Cartledge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 7, 1937No. 6 Div. 28PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between the Austin truck which he was driving and a Ford truck driven by defendant Claude Williams for defendant Armour & Co., on a public highway extending from Birmingham eastwardly toward Gadsden, at a point east of Roebuck Club toward Huffman. Defendant’s truck, which we will call the Ford, was traveling westwardly toward Birmingham and the Austin in the opposite direction. It was not a head-on collision, but the front left side of the Austin and rear left side of the Ford collided in the highway.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. South & North Ala. Railroad v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Linnehan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Birmingham Electric Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McGuff v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Starr v. StarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Bell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Capital Motor Lines v. GilletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API