Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Sandick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 23, 1992, which ruled *738that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Claimant worked as a per diem substitute teacher for the employer during the 1990-1991 school year. By a June 12, 1991 letter from the employer, claimant was notified that the employer "anticipate^] as much work for day-to-day per diem substitutes during the 1991-92 school [year] as there was in the 1990-91 school year”. The letter went on to state that per diem substitutes "should stay in contact with the representative of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claims of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of LaudadioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Claims of HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Claim of LuchunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of AlcidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of FilettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Board of Education of City School District v. Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Claims of GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002