Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Makis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 15, 1995, which ruled that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant had worked on a per diem basis as a substitute teacher in six different school districts. In June 1994, Owego Apalachin Central School District and Candor Central School District notified claimant that her name would appear on a list of substitute teachers available for the 1994-1995 school year. Claimant thereafter applied for unemployment insurance benefits for which the Board, in two separate decisions,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SandickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of MaassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. In re the Claim of LombardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WhitingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re Claims of SummersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API