Legal Opinion

Warden v. Mendocino County

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, C. J.:

The plaintiff, the Sheriff of Mendocino County, brought this action for fees alleged to be due him for services rendered in criminal cases in behalf of the county, extending over a period commencing in June, 1865, and ending in February, 1866'. The defendant demurred to the complaint. The demurrer being overruled, an answer was filed meeting the allegations of the complaint either by direct denial or by matters in avoidance. The cause was tried on the 24th of July, 1866, before the Judge, without a jury, which resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Fries v. Supervisors of Marin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Voll v. HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wetherbee v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Galbraith v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. David & Son v. Hurgren & AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Credits Commutation Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API