Legal Opinion

Ohio Transport, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1955No. Nos. 34308 & 34309Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Although the appellant assigns 25 specifications of error, all of them are included in the following four questions presented by this appeal:

1. Did the commission have jurisdiction to revoke or suspend appellant’s permit for the reasons specified in its citation order?

2. Was the penalty inflicted by the commission excessive or unreasonable ?

3. Was the commission estopped from revoking or suspending the permit of appellant because of the provisions of Section 4903.08, Revised Code?

4. Did the commission err in not disqualifying the chairman from participating in this proceeding?

Section 614-105,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheible v. HoganOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Alspaugh v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re BottOhio Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API