Legal Opinion

In Re Bott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1946No. 30476PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The question for the determination of this court may be stated as follows:

In an action brought by a merchandising corporation against another corporation and certain of its officers, engaged in the same line of business in the same city, to recover the value of merchandise which plaintiff corporation claims was stolen from it by certain of its former employees who left its employ and thereafter organized the defendant corporation, became officers of, and engaged in selling for, the defendant corporation the same types of merchandise as sold by the plaintiff corporation, may a notary public as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. American Glucose Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bevan v. KriegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. In re MerkleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Losey v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Perfect Measuring Tape Co. v. NotheisOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Robinson v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Ohio Transport, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API