Legal Opinion

Parnell v. Wadlington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1913No. 2540PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by 1>. C. Wadlington and another, a partnership known as Wadlington & Wadlington, a firm of attorneys, against the guardian of the estate of Hoyt and Ewing Parnell, minors; for legal services. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This cause was tried in the district court of McClain county in October, 1910, the same being an action- by Wadlington & Wadlington, a firm of attorneys, against Hoyt and Ewing Parnell, minors, dnd their guardian for legal services rendered in different suits on behalf of said minors. The claims for said services had been filed in the county court of McClain county and allowed by said court, and it was further ordered by the county court that the guardian of the estate of said minors pay to said firm of lawyers the fees so allowed and ordered. The guardian refused to pay…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. In Re Estate of TalomaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Talomase v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API