Legal Opinion

Architectural Services

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided June 18, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sidney Margulies, Deputy Attorney General, and Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General,

You have asked this department to render an opinion interpreting the Architects’ Law1 in order that the State Board of Examiners of Architects may resolve certain problems before them.2 We shall state each problem and give our advice in the subsequent paragraphs.

I. To what extent may an engineer perform architectural work?

The fifth paragraph of section 13 of the Architects’ Law provides:

“Nothing in this act shall be construed to apply . . . to any person who is qualified under the law to use the title…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Pittsburgh Public Parking Authority PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Korr v. ButzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Baker v. ChambersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API