Legal Opinion

Gusdonovich v. Business Information Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 82-1037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DIAMOND, District Judge.

The defendants, Business Information Company (“BIC”), Ralph Passant, Angelo Nolfi, and Orville Farmer have moved for a stay of execution of the court’s judgment of August 25, 1987, pending appeal pursuant to Rule 62(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.

The “standard for ascertaining the propriety of a stay, like that governing grants of preliminary injunctions contains four elements: (1) a reasonable probability of success on appeal; (2) the prospect of irreparable harm pendente lite if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. First Amendment Coalition v. Judicial Inquiry & Review BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Equibank v. Dan-Ver Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Dan-Ver Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Grandits v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Mowbray v. KozlowskiDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1989
  4. In Re Bedford Springs Hotel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. LABMD, INC. v. TIVERSA HOLDING CORP.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API