Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 21, 1928No. 2038PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN,
District Judge. The amended complaint alleges that on February 9, 1924, the defendant First National Bank of Delano owned a note of Henry Frankman, payable to that bank, for $3,500, dated February 7, 1924, with interest at 8 per cent.; that it sold the note to the plaintiff and guaranteed its payment at maturity; that the note has not been paid. A copy of the note is set out in the amended complaint, which shows it to be payable to the First National Bank of Delano, and shows that it was indorsed in blank. The answer to the amended complaint denies that the defendant bank was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schneider v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932