East St. Louis & Treasurer of East St. Louis v. United States Ex Rel. Zebley
Supreme Court of the United States
IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OÉ THE UNITED STATES’ EOR THE ’ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE ILLINOIS.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
The relator having recovered judgments in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois upon bonds issued by the city of East St. Louis, a municipal corporation of that State, was awarded in this proceeding a peremptory mandamus. The directions of the judgment are as follows:
“ That said defendant,' the- city of East St. Louis, do, through its proper corporate authorities, levy and collect full one per cent. per annum taxes upon the assessed and equalized valuation of all the real and personal taxable property of said city for the year a. d. .1883, and subsequent…
2Cited by40 opinions
- Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Smith v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Burns v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Franklin California Tax-Free v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.