Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Carroll

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1940No. L. A. 16427, 16471Published

1Opinion of the Court

16 Cal.2d 761 (1940)

CATHERINE M. CARROLL, Appellant,

v.

RAYMOND A. CARROLL et al., Defendants; THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

L. A. Nos. 16427, 16471.

Supreme Court of California.

December 21, 1940.

C. C. Caswell and Charles E. McGinnis for Appellant.

Arch. H. Vernon, George W. Adams and John Q. Adams for Respondents.

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff against her husband and several other defendants, the prayer of the complaint containing fourteen paragraphs asking various forms of relief. As to the husband, it sought among…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hunsinger v. LandgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API