Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Crandall
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 29, 1985No. 2910PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs instituted this action for libel in two counts against the defendant. The trial court rendered judgment on the first count in favor of the corporate plaintiff in the amount of $10,000 and rendered judgment on the second count in favor of the defendant. The defendant has appealed1 from the judgment on the first count.
The trial court found the following facts: The plaintiff Twin County Sanitation Service Company, Inc. (corporation), is engaged in the business of refuse collection *216and disposal. The plaintiff Harold Monroe is a spokesman for the plaintiff corporation, although…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. McCallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Urban v. Hartford Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Proto v. Bridgeport Herald CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Battista v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. DumlaoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Hart, Nininger & Campbell Associates v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Jenkins v. Revolution Helicopter Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lega Siciliana Social Club, Inc. v. GermaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.