Legal Opinion

Marsh-Monsanto v. Clarenbach

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided February 10, 2017No. S. Ct. Civil No. 2014-0075PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

(February 10, 2017)

CABRET, Associate Justice.

Wilma Marsh-Monsanto appeals a Superior Court order dismissing her action to quiet title to certain real property on St. John and finding that all defendants claiming title to that property hold valid title. Because her claims are barred by the statute of limitations, we affirm the Superior Court’s entry of summary judgment dismissing Marsh-Monsanto’s claims. However, even though every issue Marsh-Monsanto raises on appeal is waived under this Court’s rules, we nonetheless reverse the Superior Court’s entry of summary judgment…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  2. Anderson v. American Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Penn v. MosleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  4. Burt v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024
  5. Castillo v. St. Croix Basic Services, Inc., Basic Industries, Inc., Hovensa, LLC, and Amerada Hess CorporationSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API