Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McCarthy v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 7, 2012No. A-10775Published

1Concurrence

Judge MANNHEIMER,

concurring.

I write separately to address the question of whether it violates a DUI defendant's right of confrontation when the government relies on hearsay reports to establish that the breath test machine was properly calibrated at the time of the defendant's breath test.

I acknowledge that this Court's lead opinion correctly characterizes the case law on this issue. Both before and after the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 129 *294S.Ct. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009), courts from around the country have overwhelmingly…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BerginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API