State v. Bergin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our disposition in State v. Bergin, 229 Or App 236, 211 P3d 984 (2009). In that case, we affirmed without opinion his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). He argued that the trial court erred in admitting, over his objection, certificates attesting to the accuracy of the Intoxilyzer that was used to test his breath, because the state had not demonstrated that the technician who created the certificates was unavailable at trial and that defendant previously had had the opportunity to cross-examine him or her. Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. WilliamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. PealerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Ramirez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. JacobsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Matthies v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.