Bischoffsheim v. Baltzer

There having been an order for a decree sotting aside the basis of a charge by the defendants to the plaintiff of $68,-125, in an account current, as paid for $100,000 North Carolina state bonds which proved to he void, and for a resettlement of the account, several questions have been made as to carrying out the decision made. Bischoffsheim v. Baltzer, 20 Fed. Rep. 890. As this is the only item open, it can be adjusted on its own merits, and the balance duo ascertained without reference to a master, so far as appears to he claimed.

Firstly, this charge was made following sales of gold made by…