Reese v. . Rutherfurd
New York Court of Appeals
In 1870 and 1871 the plaintiffs were stock brokers in the city of New York, under the firm name of Reese & Hall, and the defendant during those years, prior to July 1, 1871, purchased and sold stocks through them as his brokers, and this action was commenced to recover of the defendant a balance claimed by the plaintiffs to be due them on account of their transactions with him'. The transactions were entered in the books of the plaintiffs, and accounts were from time to time…
Read the full summary
In 1870 and 1871 the plaintiffs were stock brokers in the city of New York, under the firm name of Reese & Hall, and the defendant during those years, prior to July 1, 1871, purchased and sold stocks through them as his brokers, and this action was commenced to recover of the defendant a balance claimed by the plaintiffs to be due them on account of their transactions with him'. The transactions were entered in the books of the plaintiffs, and accounts were from time to time rendered to the defendant, the last being rendered shortly after the close of the account. The referee, in computing…
1Opinion of the Court
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance, with costs.
All concur, except Rapablo, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Gregory v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People ex rel. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co. v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Bischoffsheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884