Sanders v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co.
New York Court of Appeals
This action was brought to compel defendant to declare dividends upon certain shares of preferred and guaranteed stock issued by a railroad corporation which was consolidated and merged in the corporation defendant, and whose obligations defendant assumed. The mem. of opinion is as follows: “We think the evidence sufficient to show plaintiff’s title to the dividends awarded to him.
Read the full summary
This action was brought to compel defendant to declare dividends upon certain shares of preferred and guaranteed stock issued by a railroad corporation which was consolidated and merged in the corporation defendant, and whose obligations defendant assumed. The mem. of opinion is as follows: “We think the evidence sufficient to show plaintiff’s title to the dividends awarded to him. Prior adjudications in this court have settled all the questions in this case affecting the general merits. (Boardman v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co., 84 N. Y. 157; Jermain v. Same, 91 id. 483.) “…
1Opinion of the Court
Earl, J.,
reads for modification as above, and for affirmance as modified.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Donnelly v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Gregory v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- New York Trust Co. v. Detroit, T. & I. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Brady v. The Mayor of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Phœnix Bridge Co. v. Keystone Bridge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.