Legal Opinion
Riedley v. Hudson Motor Car Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 11, 1949No. 1482PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Chas. J. Riedley, a resident of Kentucky, is engaged in business under the trade name of Riedley Motor Company.
H.e filed his complaint in this action May 5, 1948. The first count alleges that the defendants, Hudson Motor Car Company, a Michigan corporation, and Koster-Swope Motors Inc., a Kentucky corporation, conspired to restrain and monopolize Interstate Commerce by agreeing to refuse renewal of a dealership contract in motor cars and accessories, which the plaintiff had with the defendant Hudson Motor Car Company.
The second count of the .complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Geneva Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schwing Motor Company v. Hudson Sales CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Northern California Monument Dealers Ass'n v. Interment Ass'nDistrict Court, D. California · 1954
- Parmelee Transportation Company v. KeeshinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- Miller Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1957
- Nelligan v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.