Legal Opinion

Banko v. Apple Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 27, 2013No. CV 13-02977 RSPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

RICHARD SEEBORG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter arises from the decision by defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) to fire plaintiff Joshua Banko (“Banko”). The complaint asserts five claims for relief. Defendant Apple moves to dismiss all five claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, with leave to amend. This matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument pursuant to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Verble v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. Somers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Bussing v. COR Clearing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014
  5. Davies v. Broadcom Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API