Legal Opinion

United States v. Hempfling

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 22, 2006No. 1:05-CV-005940WW SMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. 43) AND TO STRIKE (DOC. 44) AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this civil action to permanently enjoin Defendant Steven Hemp-fling, d/b/a the Free Enterprise Society (“Defendant” or “Hempfling”), from engaging in conduct allegedly in violation of the internal revenue laws. (See Compl., Doc. 39.) Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiffs claims on the grounds that (i) the complaint does not allege fraudulent conduct with sufficient…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. Deedy v. SuzukiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  3. Hargrove & Constanzo v. CommissionerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  4. (PC) Bland v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Bouie v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API