Legal Opinion

(PC) Bland v. Salazar

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 23, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01499Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01499-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE DENIED AND THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE 14 REUBEN A. SALAZAR II, BE DENIED 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 39 & 45) 16 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS 17 18 Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Plaintiff filed the complaint…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API