Legal Opinion

(PC) Bouie v. Smith

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2023No. 2:18-cv-02040Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Dirk Jaong Bouie, Jr., No. 2:18-cv-02040-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Oscar Smith, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The case was assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial purposes under 18 | this District’s Local Rules. See E.D. Cal. L-.R. 302(c). The discovery stage of the case has now 19 | begun. See Discovery & Scheduling Order, ECF No. 68. Plaintiff Dirk Jaong Bouie, Jr. asked 20 | the Magistrate Judge to appoint an attorney to represent him. See generally Mot., ECF No. 70.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. HempflingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API