Legal Opinion

Goolsbee v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1950No. A-2641PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

The question presented here is whether the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held that, as a matter of law, petitioner was not entitled to recover any damages in this suit.

Addison Goolsbee filed this suit against the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company for personal injuries sustained by him, due to the alleged negligence of the employees of the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company. Based upon the answers of the jury to the special issues submitted, the trial court entered judgment for Goolsbee in the sum of $22,500. Upon the filing of a motion for new trial, the trial court ordered that a new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Beck v. BrowningTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Texas & New Orleans R. v. GoolsbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Goolsbee v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lujan v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Maryland Insurance Co. v. Head Industrial Coatings & Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  5. Fain v. Texas-Hanover Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API