Legal Opinion

Pash v. Wagner

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 25, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

This is an action by the payees against the makers of a promissory note in the sum of $700. The pleadings are oral, the answer consisting of a general denial and two defenses, the pertinent one of which is the *824absence of consideration. Plaintiffs have obtained summary judgment for the full amount of the note besides 15% thereof as costs of collection and attorneys’ fees as therein provided, or a total of $805 with interest from June 1, 1955, and the costs and disbursements of the action. The defendants contend that it was error to grant summary judgment for the plaintiffs and that they are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Iseli Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Marco v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Rosengardt v. Muhlfelder Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Kapplow v. Abelard Schuman Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API