Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Proodos Marine Carriers Co. & Overseas Shipping & Logistics

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1984No. 83 Civ. 9248-CSHPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

This case arises on petitioner’s motion to compel arbitration, and respondent’s cross-motion to confirm a prior partial award of an arbitration panel, fill' a vacancy in that panel, and restrict the issues which may come before the panel in future. The case was originally assigned to Judge Cannella. In his temporary absence from court, it came to the undersigned sitting in Part I because the circumstances required prompt resolution. Those circumstances involve imminent dates for voyages to be performed under the contract which forms the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between A/s Siljestad, and Hideca Trading, Inc., and Cross-Petitioner-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between A/S Siljestad & Hideca Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Salt Lake Pressmen & Platemakers, Local Union No. 28 v. Newspaper Agency Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ottley v. SchwartzbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Ottley v. SchwartzbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Anderman/smith Operating Co. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. North River Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Blue Tee Corp. v. Koehring Company and United Dominion Industries, Inc., (Formerly Known as Amca International Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API